Last summer is consumed the divorce among Maurizio Sarri and the Napoli of Aurelio De Laurentis.

It happened a bloody divorce offline and in direct tv with some formalities that have left the bitterness in mouth to the Neapolitan fans all and above all to the ex Tuscan trainer.

The president De Laurentis, after an it throws and rubber band long months, it has practically fired Sarri without warning, definitely veering on Carlo Ancelotti.

Although the style anything else other than impeccable in to face all of this they were in few to wait him for such a cold dismissal toward a trainer that, also not winning trophies, he has made the recent history and not only the recent history of the club.

In alone 3 years Napoli has passed by to be a beautiful Italian reality to be a serious contender for the italian championship and a team to the point whose game has been appreciated all over the world to coin the term "Sarrismo."

The cleverness of De Laurentis has been that to consume the divorce spending one of the few names on it places that, at least in theory, he would not have made to regret the "Maestro"

In many they were sceptic, above all in Naples.

But beyond the matters of heart that they will see Sarri always have a privileged place to Naples, indeed the case to judge the choice of De Laurentis?

"Sarrismo"

Soccer is a sport and in the sport, it is said, the main point is to participate.

Unlike so many other sports and unlike so many other countries in Italy it is in force the rule that if don't win six a loser.

It seems that other doesn't count.

In the analysis of the season of a team is not kept in mind of what potentialities are, of if that society has held the accounts to place, than is amusing see to play that teams, of what the value of the team is, of what the history and the context is.

If you are a team of tall classification you must win the championship. If you are of average greatness you must go to Europe, if you are small you must save yourself.

If don't reach these objectives you have failed.

Who doesn't win it is lost.

And' a lost mentality that makes of Italy, also in a sporting field, a country with a subculture becera and resoundingly suicidal.

The adversaries also exist. The relationships of strength exist.

You cannot be thought that a team as Napoli, that has won only with Maradona in his history, and that in the recent history the Serie C and the bankruptcy has lived can compete with colossuses as Juventus in primis but also Rome, Inter and Milan that have, for instance, foreign ownerships composed by magnates multimillionaires that live the societies as were of the multinationals.

The advent of Sarri has been as that of a sporting messia that has brought in that plaza the certainty to be a virtuous, healthy and competitive society that, as David against Golia, could aspire to something special.

Maurizio Sarri, come by the experience to Empoli (not to Barcellona or PSG), he has brought a sporting culture and of the job that was impossible to be found in this historical moment elsewhere.

The job of the Tuscan technician has been maniacal and he has beenfocused everything on innovative technical and physical trainings and of high-level that had a preference for the control of the ball and the game to the adaptation toward adversaries and situations.

Every trainer in his unconscious the same question is always set:

Will they be the adversaries to force to suit me to me for their game or will I be me to force them to suit for mine?

Maurizio Sarri, for the first time in the history in the Naples, he has forced all the adversaries to look for adjustments so that to oppose the technical strapotere - tactical of the Naples.

The "Sarrismo" has been confused with a style of offensive game.

Nothing more wrong.

The defensive phase in the Napoli of Sarri has been one of the most complex and effective of the last 30 years.

The key concept was that to reiterate unique movements for every phase of not possession.

What does it mean?

Overall the defenders of the napoli and the 11 players recorded synchronous and schematic movements according to where the ball was found in the offensive phase avversaria.

Nothing was left to the case.

The players of the Naples never attacked the carrier of ball in how much such but they created such conditions for which the team avversaria never succeeded in finding results to install the door of Reina.

It is not a case that the granite defense in the Napoli has often granted gol from the long distance or from situations of firm ball but has rarely granted avversaria to build gol occasions to the team.

As it regards the offensive phase all they have great familiarity with that that was a manoeuvre winding sort of small touches, passages of before and cuts of the outside of attack with ready terzini always to overlap and to look for the I unload behind more than the cross in area. It is not a case that for 3 years the Naples has had the positive record of succeeded passages and possession ball in the whole series To, always resulting in top 10 in Europe.

Ancelotti, pragmatism and dinamism

With these premises Ancelotti leaned out.

To make to forget Sarri or at least not to make him regret it seemed one of the impossible enterprises that can happen to a trainer.

Few seemed to care that Carletto was one of the most winning trainers of the history of the soccer, with championships and Champions easily won disarming in contexts and different championships.

"He has always trained stuffed teams of champions" they said all and they still say in many.

"It won't play well, the game doesn't know how to create it" others said.

Nonsense, who said and it says this he has not seen the teams of Ancelotti play and it doesn't have idea of how many trainers fail and have also failed having teams of champions in pink.

To few more than one month from the beginning of the championship the Napoli boasts 5 victories and a balance and it can consider him to the moment as the team that the best kick plays.

We are not to the levels of Sarri yet, the qualities are different, the characteristics are changed and also the ways to train and to intend the played soccer, but everything allows to presage that Ancelotti can do a good job, in a context where the unbeatable Juventus of these years has purchased the strongest player to the world and the other whole contenders han placed hits of cry market.

What's changed?

Between Ancelotti and Sarri there is a great difference in the way to intend the game, the tactic and the trainings.

With Sarri there was necessity of players that made the perfect mechanism. They were not the sum of the single players to do the total one but the exact opposite. It was the idea of game to have to be improved and maximized through the study and the availability of the single ones.

To make that this happened it was necessary not to change very the actors in field.

That's why the turn over with Sarri seemed to be a curse-word. In many have criticized the Tuscan trainer for this, except to retract him when in the few occasions in which the turn over was practised the Naples it disfigured.

The various Hisaj, Mertens, Ghoulams for instance succeeded to the car to make perfect, because they had understood very well what the movements and the logics that Sarri desired to effect were.

If in 3 years the Naples himself has always beaten, improving his own seasonal records all time, has entered the target of so many trainers that have begun to study the Sarrismo and if Higuain has succeeded in beating the old record of Angelillo in fact of annual marcature in championship the worth it has exclusively been of Sarri.

With Ancelotti this rigidity is evaporated.

In 6 game of championship he has lined up well 21 different holders! More than how much Sarri had lined up in a season of it.

More turns over therefore and so much involvement for all the players.

With Ancelotti all are felt motivated and important.

With Sarri 13-14 players were felt special. The rest they were felt marginalized.

Also De Laurentis had always criticized this to Sarri and now Ancelotti is satisfying the president valorizing all from Luperto to Maksimovic, from Rog to Diawara, from Milik to Verdi, from Malcuit to Ruiz, passing for Ounas.

This variety has allowed Carletto to modulate the scheme of game according to the adversaries and of the situations passing from the 4-3-3 initial to forms as the 4-4-2 to 4-2-3-1 and 4-4-1 -1.

The adversaries of the Naples that knew before to thing to go toward and they were suited for Sarri trying to limit the damages today they don't literally know the Naples who will line up and with that form will play.

At the same time Ancelotti has available so many solutions and so many players to be able to face to equal weapons any adversary.

It loses a little of it the show and there will be great defensive holes and situations in which the partenopeis must tighten the teeth but they will be also surely you so many other arrows to cast.

If with Sarri they were always the adversaries to owe him to adapt the Naples today can afford to suit for the adversaries without losing identity and supremacy technician tactical.

With Sarri, besides we assisted to winding manoeuvres and continuous forcing with 90 minutes of blue dominion.

With Ancelotti the Naples has stopped being winding and weary of the manoeuvre maintaining tall the possession ball and never his own offensive action.

Appointment with the history

2 different way to conceive soccer that don't seem, however, to determine a decrease in the results in the Naples.

If the main point is to perhaps win then one day of it Sarri of it Ancelotti they will be remembered.

Who loves the soccer, who has historical and sporting memory will know how to appreciate both.

Sarri, that likes or less, it is already in the annals of the soccer.

Pure Ancelotti.

The time will tell us who will have been more main point and winner for the "pacifier" and the fans partenopei.