For the first time in human history, a artificial intelligence computer machine interacted with humans and answered human arguments on two subjects.
In this debate in San Francisco's hall, IBM's Project Debtter, a computer-based company, talked to others and responded with the arguments that were raised.
Experts have described this progress as a big milestone in the history of artificial intelligence.
This machine with a library of hundreds of documents, including articles from newspapers, and research articles of academic journals, presented their arguments on topics concerning which participants of the discussion were not already aware.
There was a few sessions in the performance of artificial intelligence machine, but satellites sitting in the hall could vote on man and machine performance.
Man's style was a good word, but it was deeper in the arguments of artificial intelligence.
IBM says it has helped it reach its target. That means that humans can make their decisions faster through more information than ever.
In this debate, Nova Odyria, said, 'I think this progress is a major milestone of reaction to humans' facts and figures.
'I think artificial intelligent machine has utility but it can not do everything that can make human intellect to make arguments.'
Nova Oyda has been the 2016 champion of the national debating of Israel and she joined IBM to discuss a artificial intelligence machine.
He told the BBC: 'I think through this we can be able to do more better, in their decision (ie artificial intelligence) to decide on the basis of information based on information, information. It will be very beneficial to vote based on or based on information.
Without the help of internet
Project debut was not connected to the Internet during this discussion. But all its information contain data and data from the data that IBM experts gathered and collected for this machine.
This machine participated in two discussions of the discussion. The first issue was whether more public funding should be required for space investigation. The second issue was whether more investments should be done for the promotion of telecommunications technology.
Both man and machine co-participated were given four four minutes to start their argument. And then each was given four to four minutes to answer the argument, and finally two two minutes were given to accommodate their arguments.
When the new OOIDA presented its argument, while saying that government money should be spent on other important needs rather than space probe, the artificial intelligence machine responded that it is very easy to say that it is very important to spend money on other important things. And I will not disagree with that. No one is claiming this, only on our agenda is the case. But here's not this topic.
Because spending on government research on space research will benefit society. That's why I would say that the government should spend money on this project.
Like a man involved in discussion, the machine was not even aware about the subject. However, the IBM machine had a list of themes around the world, and its experts think that project debuters will be able to discuss this with a collection of information.
IBM research director Arvind Krishna wrote in one of his blogs, "With time consuming and other related applications, we can use this system in such cases where we are not able to reach it now."
Speaking to the BBC, Arvind Krishna said, "With this successful experience, we have reached this limit of artificial intelligence where Google now has to demonstrate its success."
Project debitter is actually to gain access to different computer languages, and languages are a sector, and there is no wrong and right objection in this matter. (Programming is done incorrectly and accurately in computer logging).
Therefore, during these discussions the artistic intelligence machine that was not performing well was that he repeatedly expressed his own argument in different words, the argument repeatedly, or new arguments with the rise of new angles in the same argument The result that the resulting data of the machine seemed to be.
Practical Advantages
Chris Red, Professor of the University of Dundee, UK, has described this artificial intelligence machine experience as an important and influential technology.
Professor Red has no connection with the IBM and he says that this experience is a major breakthrough. 'What I am impressed is that many technical skills of artificial intelligence have been used. And it is not easy to use in such a complex process like a discussion.
'First you have to find a solution to many problems and then solve the problems by analyzing all these problems.'
IBM is not new in the field of demonstration at the public level of artificial intelligence. His computer named "Watson" had won America's 2011 2011 Game Show 'Geopedi'. Earlier, its 'Deep Blue' computer had defeated Chess's World Champion Giri Caspieiro in 1997.
But it is always a tricky task to use technology behind the famous artworks for an outstanding solution. Although it was not told how many but IBM has recently dismissed many of its employees from the job. And it was working on Healthcare Application Watson.
IBM Arvind Krishna says major companies of the company prefer commercial interests first.
'When you are in a position to decide somewhere, then you decide yourself and sometimes you do it while others say.'
Professor Red says, 'If you enable project debuters to understand the subject of a topic, what is behind you, then you can use them in even more profitable tasks.
'I think this is to create a kind of team, where humans participate in discussion and computing in the form of a group.
'It is obvious that they will have some weaknesses and some positive things will happen. The aim is to build these teams in such a way that they can work better than humans 'own capabilities.'
Professor Chris Red, in future, artificial intelligence machines will not be problematic themselves, but the matter is what data is collected to these machines and what kind of prejudice they will have.
Comments