Everyone already knows that Nobel Arustamyan left Match TV of his own free will after an interview with the footballer, Rostov player Pavel Mamaev. The journalist himself said that he did not agree with the editorial policy of the channel, which did not fit with his personal opinion and principles. The channel's management, represented by Tina Kandelaki, believes that Nobel put in the first place not work, but his own YouTube channel. He resigned only because he did not want to work in accordance with editorial policy. Was it possible to turn a simple interview about an athlete's personal life into content that fits the editorial policy of the Match TV channel?

Nobel Arustamyan's opinion

The journalist stated that he did not know that during the interview they would not say practically anything about sports. He believed that it was necessary to talk about sports topics, practically without touching the player's personal life.

He pointed out that he cannot work in an atmosphere, on a channel, where editorial policy is at odds with his personal beliefs, principles and opinions. Accordingly, it is not surprising that Nobel asked not to air this particular interview, which has nothing to do with football.

Due to the fact that Nobel wanted to defend his point of view, he was asked to "leave" of his own free will. In fact, the dismissal occurred when the journalist was in the air and returned from an interview.

Tina Kandelaki: general producer of the Match TV channel

Tina believes that the journalist did not do his job. It is not clear why, she remembered an event that happened earlier and was not connected with Mamaev. That is, she stated that Nobel spoke with the coach of the Russian national football team, and posted the material on her channel. Thus, he prioritized. The Match TV channel itself, where he worked and earned money, was far from in the first place.

She regrets that Nobel left the staff of the TV channel. But she does not want to deviate from editorial policy. Tina believes that the journalist himself was not able to conduct a dialogue with the football player in the way that was needed for sports fans and ordinary people.

The opinion of journalists

Konstantin Genich and Vasily Utkin believe that Arustamyan behaved like a real professional. They believe that there are not many such journalists. Nobel is a real professional who can benefit any sports channel. He is able to understand the smallest details of any sporting event.

Instead of conclusions

Yes, the journalist himself is a real professional. In order for the material to be 100% suitable for a sports channel, only a few questions had to be asked. For example:

1) How did the crisis in personal relationships with your wife affect your sports career?

2) Did the divorce affect the quality of the game and the football results of Mamaev?

3) Did your teammates and the coaching staff support Mamaev?

In short, any mediocre interview can be corrected with a couple of right questions. On the other hand, the Nobel should be given credit here. He really didn't want nonsense to flood the sports channel. There is no need to turn "Match TV" into a soapy, sweet channel, where everyone's bones are washed. First of all, sport should dominate here!