“Man nomadis” vs “Man stabilis first parte”
This is the first post of a series of six Living in the countryside starting from spring, as long as it is possible, I love walking in it and feeding myself in the numerous fruits that grow in spontaneous or abandoned trees. What abundance, which is also free, is certainly 100% organic, without even needing some certification, I would say sustainable for the environment as a zero kilometer! Primitive man, it is said, at the dawn was collector, so he did not work to get food, he simply collected what he found spontaneously in the environment. Then agriculture came and the men became permanent and instead of turning to eat, they started working to eat. I ask myself a question: "Have we earned us to trade freedom in exchange for the need to work?" Throwed them there, this question seems to have a foregone answer. After all, when you change it is because you want it, so it's a free choice. If the first men at one point preferred to stop, to put up their homes and become permanent, it means that it was evidently a better prospect than that of being forced to turn continuously in the hope of finding enough food. One of the crucial points that has brought this epochal change is certainly the safety factor, cultivating certainly allows more guarantees to have what to feed, rather than having to do every day "a treasure hunt". Soon the first farmers realized the possibility of being able to produce more food than needed at the time, then developing the art of food preservation, was able to ensure its food support even in the most difficult periods of the year, we think for example in the winter months. Agriculture and consequently breeding gave life to the first exchanges, that is, to the primordial forms of commerce that initially were based on barter, a precursor of the birth of money and a more sophisticated economy.
“Man nomadis” vs “Man stabilis first parte”
This is the first post of a series of six Living in the countryside starting from spring, as long as it is possible, I love walking in it and feeding myself in the numerous fruits that grow in spontaneous or abandoned trees. What abundance, which is also free, is certainly 100% organic, without even needing some certification, I would say sustainable for the environment as a zero kilometer! Primitive man, it is said, at the dawn was collector, so he did not work to get food, he simply collected what he found spontaneously in the environment. Then agriculture came and the men became permanent and instead of turning to eat, they started working to eat. I ask myself a question: "Have we earned us to trade freedom in exchange for the need to work?" Throwed them there, this question seems to have a foregone answer. After all, when you change it is because you want it, so it's a free choice. If the first men at one point preferred to stop, to put up their homes and become permanent, it means that it was evidently a better prospect than that of being forced to turn continuously in the hope of finding enough food. One of the crucial points that has brought this epochal change is certainly the safety factor, cultivating certainly allows more guarantees to have what to feed, rather than having to do every day "a treasure hunt". Soon the first farmers realized the possibility of being able to produce more food than needed at the time, then developing the art of food preservation, was able to ensure its food support even in the most difficult periods of the year, we think for example in the winter months. Agriculture and consequently breeding gave life to the first exchanges, that is, to the primordial forms of commerce that initially were based on barter, a precursor of the birth of money and a more sophisticated economy.
“Man nomadis” vs “Man stabilis first parte”
This is the first post of a series of six Living in the countryside starting from spring, as long as it is possible, I love walking in it and feeding myself in the numerous fruits that grow in spontaneous or abandoned trees. What abundance, which is also free, is certainly 100% organic, without even needing some certification, I would say sustainable for the environment as a zero kilometer! Primitive man, it is said, at the dawn was collector, so he did not work to get food, he simply collected what he found spontaneously in the environment. Then agriculture came and the men became permanent and instead of turning to eat, they started working to eat. I ask myself a question: "Have we earned us to trade freedom in exchange for the need to work?" Throwed them there, this question seems to have a foregone answer. After all, when you change it is because you want it, so it's a free choice. If the first men at one point preferred to stop, to put up their homes and become permanent, it means that it was evidently a better prospect than that of being forced to turn continuously in the hope of finding enough food. One of the crucial points that has brought this epochal change is certainly the safety factor, cultivating certainly allows more guarantees to have what to feed, rather than having to do every day "a treasure hunt". Soon the first farmers realized the possibility of being able to produce more food than needed at the time, then developing the art of food preservation, was able to ensure its food support even in the most difficult periods of the year, we think for example in the winter months. Agriculture and consequently breeding gave life to the first exchanges, that is, to the primordial forms of commerce that initially were based on barter, a precursor of the birth of money and a more sophisticated economy.